Andy has entered the chat — and let’s just say, he’s not thrilled.
In a recent Facebook post, Andy announced he was banned from “East Brunswick Action” and claimed Eyes on EB is “equally guilty.” Guilty of what, exactly? Sharing public legal documents? Raising questions about how our township operates? Posting receipts?
Hard to say. But let’s unpack what’s really going on here.
What Andy Could Have Done
Before calling out blogs and stirring up drama, Andy had options. Simple ones. He could’ve:
✅ Watched the town council meeting where $28,000 worth of backstop removals was discussed
✅ Read the civil complaint and court case documents from Lancos v. East Brunswick — already posted and linked
✅ Filed a basic OPRA request like any concerned resident
✅ Asked, “Why was a township employee denied fertility coverage that others would’ve received?” — instead of “Why did someone write about it?”
The Facts Are Public
What’s in the blog isn’t speculation. It’s based on:
-
? A Civil Complaint filed in Middlesex County (Docket No. MID-L-003493-22)
-
? A Civil Case Information Statement confirming the type and nature of the lawsuit
-
?️ A Settlement letter submitted to the court by the Township’s attorneys
No spin. No edits. No conspiracy. Just public info that anyone — even ANDY — can go look up.
Final Thought
Andy’s not banned from Eyes on EB — he’s just mad at it. And look, we get it. It’s easier to be annoyed at the person pointing out the fire than to ask who lit the match.
But instead of being upset that someone wrote a blog, maybe be upset that a same-sex couple had to sue the township just to get fair treatment. That’s the part that should spark outrage.
Here at Eyes on EB, we still love Andy—we’re not sure what he has against us, or which friend we may have written about that got his panties in an uproar, but maybe Andy’s not actually mad at us at all… maybe he’s just sticking up for a friend—or two.
Thanks for the blog idea, Andy. You’ve done your civic duty — whether you meant to or not.
